#WithdrawTheCAP What is the CAP and why should I care?

What is the CAP and why should I care?

The CAP is one of the oldest policies of the EU and was first introduced in 1962 to provide subsidies for EU farmers to improve agricultural productivity and food security in post-WWII Europe.

However, since then, the CAP has mushroomed into an outdated, inefficient and unaccountable mechanism dominated by big agri-lobbyists and agricultural countries – and accounts for 40% of the EU’s budget – that is, all the money that member states contribute to finance EU-wide projects and policies – goes directly to the CAP.

The problem with Europe’s agricultural policy

The EU agricultural budget is first distributed among all member states based on a proportional calculation. In a next step, these subsidies available to the member states are passed on to the companies applying for it.

The amount of money each company gets is calculated mainly – and this is the big problem – according to the area of operation and its production capacity.

Regardless of their environmental contributions or, conversely, how much they harm it.

This system has led to an industrial overproduction of food that the European market can’t even consume and has put substantial pressure on our soils and wildlife.

The result?

80% of the total funds end up in the hands of only 20% of farms, predominantly big corporations. Or the other way around: 80% of companies have to survive on only 20% of the available budget. A budget that is indirectly benefiting damaging agricultural practices over ecological, regenerative ones.

Why the new reform changes nothing

Industrial agriculture is now the number one driver of deforestation and a huge carbon contributor. It’s eroding our soils, pushing wildlife, insects and plants into extinction, and it’s responsible for about 30% of the world’s total emissions of greenhouse gases.

About 50-70% of carbon historically sequestered in the world’s soils has already been released as a result of industrial agriculture.

Last year, European citizens voted for a new set up of the European Parliament (EP).

Here at Ecosia we urged our European followers to go vote. With too little time to curb climate change and because the EP is voted for only every five years, its set up was more important than ever before.

Luckily, the Parliament saw a significant increase of green-leaning individuals and parties entering the stage. Unfortunately, it seems this is not enough. There is still a majority of short-sighted members in the Parliament.

That has become painfully clear after this week’s votes on the different amendments to the CAP. The new design of the next funding period for the CAP from 2021 to 2027 has been in negotiations since last year.

The new proposal, of which you can read a summary here, still doesn’t get rid of the direct payments, which is problematic. Farmers should only get direct payments if they provide a service to society: food production and environmental protection.

Even after its reform, the European agricultural policy continues to protect the big agricultural lobby, bringing us further away from reaching any goals laid out in the European Green Deal.

Here’s how you can help right now

Members of the European Parliament are tied to national parties. However, these parties don’t sit as such in the Parliament. Instead, they are grouped along ideological lines.

For example, in Germany, the conservative party CDU has a representation in the EP. In the EP, this party sits in the EPP Group (European People’s Party) along with other European parties with similar ideologies, such as the Partido Popular in Spain.

A closer look at the votes cast yesterday proves that established political groups in the European Parliament are dooming the continent to a climate disaster.

This is especially true for the S&D group, where most of Europe’s traditional socialist parties sit, such as the German SPD or the Spanish PSOE.

While prior to the elections to the European Parliament in 2019, the socialist parties comprising this group in the EP pledged they would vote for a complete reform of the CAP, their vote this week – with a few notable exceptions – contradicts their promises.

Today, on October 23, the EP will cast its last votes on the CAP reform. Because the S&D group has a significant number of seats in the EP, their vote for or against the last details of this reform could actually vote the CAP down, and save Europe’s organic and regenerative farms, rather than financing agricultural practices that are threatening our future.

Head to Ecosia’s Twitter account to find a list of MEPs whose votes could make the difference. Tag these MEPs along with their national parties in your country to call them out for breaking their promises.

This vote will decide whether we rob future generations of their right to fertile soils and a stable climate, or not.

Think something new

At a fee of $30 per month, child sponsorship is very possible and with such and more we are in position to create lasting impact for a child at our orphanage home With this amount we are in position to provide education, food, clothing and medical care for the children.

Upon accepting to sponsor a child, we give you access to the children profiles so that you could choose a specific child you wish to sponsor. In the due term you always write letters to them and they too write to you

What about it? Child sponsorship

Education Child sponsorship

Child sponsorship is the most effective way to raise children out of poverty. Through our sponsorship program you can sponsor a child, sponsor a college student, or sponsor a home.

Child sponsorship allows you to witness the strength of your giving first hand. See a child rise up from an unthinkable past to a bright future because of your sponsorship.


Cherish Aid foundation( CAF ) is actively seeking funding from corporations in Kampala, and is also exploring the avenue of foreign based foundation grants.

If you would like to sponsor a child in our foundation, now is a perfect time to do so. If you would like to make a lump sum donation to Cherish Aid foundation, please visit our ‘Make a Donation’ page and we have a number of easy and secure ways for you do so.’ By visiting our ‘Activities‘ page, you will learn precisely what CAF projects require our focus right now, and you will have a very clear picture of how we will be using your donations. Lastly, click on the ‘Volunteering‘ link to find out more about what it means to be a volunteer at CAF.

One Dollar a day gives a child at Cherish Aid foundation the resources needed to get adequate care and an education.

Many children in Uganda have been orphaned as a result of the country’s HIV/AIDS epidemic and war in the nearby countries like Sudan and now as a result many orphans are living alone or with one of their extended family; this means that in every family there is an orphan living with them.

Some of these children are living on the streets of Kampala and other towns with no access to education, health care, shelter and feeding. As a result, many find their way into crime. That’s why initiatives like (Cherish Aid foundation) have been put into place, in order to assimilate these children into society and give the children vision, future prospects. We are making a real difference in their lives. We cannot ignore the plight of these children any more.It is time to accept our responsibility as a caring community and work to make a positive change in the lives of children

Community Sanitation & hygiene

With our community outreaches, we empower various hurting communities in the further rural areas of Uganda. Join us and help create lasting impacts.

In this project we help communities with cleaning their water facilities for good sanitation, good health and wellbeing.

Water and sanitation are essential for life and health, but they are also essential for dignity, empowerment and prosperity. Water and sanitation are human rights, fundamental to every child and adult. But in Uganda, poor sanitation and hygiene, as well as unequal access to safe drinking water, make thousands of children very sick and at risk of death.
Diarrhoea alone, one of three major childhood killers in Uganda, kills 33 children every day. 

In most cases, children get the disease by drinking unsafe water or coming into contact with contaminated hands — theirs or parents or caregivers — that have not been washed with soap. 

Early childhood diarrhoea is not only deadly; it also contributes to Uganda’s high levels of stunting, which in turn affects children’s cognitive development and performance at school. In school, lack of proper sanitation facilities also leads to high absenteeism and dropouts, especially for girls.

Access to improved water and sanitation facilities does not, on its own, necessarily lead to improved health. It needs another step: there is now very clear evidence showing the importance of hygienic behaviour — especially hand washing with soap after defecating and before eating or preparing food — to health improvement. 

Another key to reducing childhood illness and death is to stop using open fields or the bush as toilets. In Uganda, nearly a tenth of the population practices open defecation, and two thirds of households do not wash with soap. 

It is poor people who carry the greatest burden of poor sanitation. The poorest 20 percent of the population is 13.5 times more likely to defecate in the open than the wealthiest 20 percent, according to the World Bank.